Skip to content
MAYFLOWER SPECIALTYMayflower Specialty

For buyers and brokers

Check Where Your Insurance May Not Cover AI Claims

The Mayflower Specialty coverage gap check asks up to nine questions about how a company uses AI and which policies it holds, then shows where an AI claim may fall outside its current program and which Mayflower module is written for that gap. The check is free, asks for no contact details and gives general information rather than a review of policy wording.

Questions
Up to nine, one per screen
Cost
Free, with no account
Your answers
Kept in this browser tab
Result
Each gap mapped to a module

Up to nine questions

How the Check Works

Answer up to nine questions, one per screen: six about how your company uses AI and up to three about the insurance it carries. The results list the gaps your answers point to, explain each with a real case or rule and name the Mayflower module written for it, and your answers are kept in this browser tab throughout.

1 of 9

How you use AI

Does generative AI produce answers, content or advice that customers or other outside parties see or rely on?

This includes a support chatbot, an assistant inside your product and AI-written content you publish.

The check gives general information rather than a coverage opinion.

Silent AI and AI exclusions

Why Existing Policies May Not Answer an AI Claim

An existing D&O, EPL or E&O policy can fail to answer an AI claim in two ways: it can be silent on AI, which leaves the answer to argument after the loss, or it can exclude AI outright. Many policies in force today say nothing about AI and insurers have begun adding AI exclusions at renewal, so it is a good idea to read the wording before a claim tests it.

The coverage gap check places your own program between silence, exclusion and affirmative cover and names the module written for each gap it finds, which makes it a sensible first step before your next renewal.

Run the check
Silent AI
Silent AI is the uncertainty that arises when an insurance policy neither covers nor excludes losses caused by artificial intelligence. Whether such a policy responds to an AI claim is left to argument after the loss, which is why insurers are now adding explicit AI exclusions or affirmative AI coverage.
AI exclusion
An AI exclusion is policy wording that removes cover for claims connected to artificial intelligence, ranging from narrow carve-outs for generative AI output to absolute exclusions for any use of AI. Verisk's ISO generative AI exclusions for commercial general liability took effect in January 2026, and similar language has appeared in management and professional liability forms.
Affirmative AI coverage
Affirmative AI coverage is insurance wording that names claims arising from artificial intelligence and addresses them expressly, so that the answer to an AI claim is set out in the policy rather than argued over after a loss.Mayflower writes affirmative AI coverage as a modular primary policy or as a difference-in-conditions layer over the program a company already carries.

3

standard ISO generative AI exclusions for general liability took effect in January 2026: CG 40 47, CG 40 48 and CG 35 08

Source: Business Insurance, April 7th 2026

24

AI-related securities class actions were filed in 2026 by September 23rd, nearly 14% of all new filings

Source: The D&O Diary, September 23rd 2026

72%

of S&P 500 companies flagged AI as a material risk in annual reports filed in 2025, up from 12% in 2023

Source: The Conference Board, October 6th 2025

The questions

What the Check Looks At

Six questions cover how your company uses AI, because each use creates a different kind of claim. Up to three more cover the insurance you carry, because the wording of those policies decides whether an AI claim finds cover.

How you use AI

  1. 01

    Customer-facing generative AI

    A wrong answer given to a customer can become a claim against the company that deployed the tool.

  2. 02

    AI in hiring and workforce decisions

    Screening and ranking tools can lead to discrimination claims from applicants and employees.

  3. 03

    AI sold to clients

    Clients who rely on an AI product or an AI-assisted service can claim for the losses its errors cause.

  4. 04

    AI agents with authority to act

    An agent that changes records or moves money can cause a loss before anyone reviews its work.

  5. 05

    AI in investor communications

    Overstating AI to investors has led to SEC enforcement and to securities claims.

  6. 06

    EU and Colorado exposure

    The EU AI Act and Colorado's law on automated decisions both add obligations in 2027, and the EU rules can apply to companies outside the EU.

Your current insurance

  1. 07

    Policies in force

    Which of D&O, EPL, E&O and cyber you carry decides where an AI claim would land.

  2. 08

    Changes at renewal

    Insurers have begun adding AI exclusions and questions about AI use when policies renew, so the last renewal is the first place to look.

  3. 09

    AI wording

    A policy that says nothing about AI leaves the answer to an AI claim to be argued after the loss.

Gaps and modules

The Gaps the Check Looks For

Each gap is a place where a standard D&O, EPL, E&O or cyber policy may not answer an AI claim. The check flags the ones your answers point to and names the Mayflower module written for each, subject to the policy terms.

How the Results Are Worked Out

The check follows fixed rules rather than a model, so the same answers always give the same result. Each answer about how you use AI maps to an exposure and to the line of insurance that would usually answer it: D&O for the board and investors, EPL for decisions about people and E&O for work done for clients. Your insurance answers then decide whether that line is missing, possibly excluded, silent on AI or expressly covered, and every gap in the results lists the answers that produced it.

A likely gap means you described an AI exposure and either carry no policy for it or mentioned an AI exclusion. A possible gap means the policy you carry may be silent on AI, or you were not sure what it says.

Run the check
Sources used in the check
  1. Moffatt v. Air Canada, 2024 BCCRT 149 (Civil Resolution Tribunal of British Columbia, February 14th 2024)
  2. Mata v. Avianca, Inc., opinion and order on sanctions (U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, June 22nd 2023)
  3. Understanding AI exposures: AI loss scenarios survey results (Lloyd's Market Association, 2025)
  4. AI coding tool Replit wiped a database during a code freeze (Fortune, July 23rd 2025)
  5. Mobley v. Workday, case record (Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse, Collective conditionally certified May 16th 2025)
  6. Automated employment decision tools (Local Law 144) (NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, Enforced from July 5th 2023)
  7. Illinois Department of Human Rights withdraws proposed AI in employment rules (Burke, Warren, MacKay & Serritella, June 16th 2026)
  8. Securities class action filings surge in the first half of 2026 (Cornerstone Research, July 29th 2026)
  9. DOJ and SEC send warning against AI-washing with charges against technology startup founder (DLA Piper, April 2025)
  10. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (the AI Act), Article 2(1)(c) (EU AI Act, Official Journal of the EU, In force August 1st 2024)
  11. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 amending the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689) (AI Act amendments, Official Journal of the EU, In force July 27th 2026)
  12. Colorado SB 26-189 (Colorado General Assembly, Signed May 14th 2026)
  13. The continued proliferation of AI exclusions (Hunton Andrews Kurth, Insurance Recovery Blog, May 28th 2025)
  14. Insurers, brokers adjust as AI exclusions emerge (Business Insurance, April 7th 2026)
  15. ISO's generative AI exclusion is already on thousands of CGL policies (Insurance Business, September 16th 2026)
  16. AI-related securities suit filings continue to surge (The D&O Diary, September 23rd 2026)
  17. AI risks disclosed by S&P 500 companies (The Conference Board, October 6th 2025)

Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

Short answers about the check, what to do with its results and AI wording in existing policies.

Does my existing insurance cover AI claims?

Whether existing insurance covers an AI claim depends on the policy wording. A D&O, EPL or E&O policy may respond to an AI-related claim if nothing in it excludes AI, but many policies say nothing about AI and some insurers now add AI exclusions at renewal. The coverage gap check shows where your program may leave AI exposure, and your broker can confirm the answer against the wordings.

What should I do with the results?

Take the results to your broker, ideally at least 90 days before your next renewal, while there is still time to negotiate the AI wording or add cover. If the results point to a gap, the quote link opens Mayflower's online application with the suggested modules selected, and completing the application does not bind coverage.

Is the coverage gap check a coverage opinion?

No, the check gives general information based on your answers. It does not read your policies, and whether a policy responds to a claim depends on its wording and the facts of the claim. Use the results as a list of questions for your broker; if you apply, the application asks about your current insurance, so underwriting sees your program as a whole.

What happens to my answers?

Your answers are kept in this browser tab and cleared when you close it, and Mayflower does not receive them or link them to you. The page records anonymous usage events, such as how many gaps the check found and which modules it suggested, and it never asks for your name or email. If you continue to a quote, only the suggested modules travel with you, in the link.

Can a broker run the check for a client?

Yes, a broker can answer the questions for a client and use the results to open a renewal conversation about AI wording. The quote link carries the suggested modules into the online application, which a broker can complete on a client's behalf by choosing the broker option at the start.

Next step

Take Your Results to an Application or a Conversation

The online application mirrors Mayflower's supplemental application and saves as you go, and completing it does not bind coverage. If you would rather talk the results through first, send a short message.

Mayflower's underwriting team responds within 48 hours.