This glossary gives plain definitions of the AI and insurance terms that appear in AI liability policies, applications and claims, written for risk, legal and finance readers. Where Mayflower Specialty covers a subject in more depth, in a guide or on a coverage page, the entry links to it.
An absolute AI exclusion is policy wording that removes cover for any claim based upon, arising out of or attributable to the use, deployment or development of artificial intelligence by anyone. Its breadth means a claim with only a loose connection to AI can fall outside the policy, which is why such wording deserves close attention at renewal. W. R. Berkley introduced an exclusion of this kind for D&O, E&O and fiduciary liability in 2025.
Affirmative AI coverage is insurance wording that names claims arising from artificial intelligence and addresses them expressly, so that the answer to an AI claim is set out in the policy rather than argued over after a loss.
Agentic AI describes systems that pursue a goal by planning and taking actions themselves, such as calling tools, moving money or changing records, with limited human review of each step. Because an agent acts as well as advises, its mistakes can turn directly into loss; in July 2025 an AI agent on Replit's platform deleted a production database during a code freeze.
The aggregate limit is the most a policy will pay for all covered claims in the policy period combined. Once payments, including defense costs where they sit inside the limit, reach the aggregate, the policy pays nothing more for that period.
AI DIC Excess is a difference-in-conditions layer that sits over a company's existing D&O, EPL and E&O policies and adds affirmative AI coverage where those policies are silent on AI or exclude it. It lets a company address the AI gap without replacing the program and insurers it already has.
An AI exclusion is policy wording that removes cover for claims connected to artificial intelligence, ranging from narrow carve-outs for generative AI output to absolute exclusions for any use of AI. Verisk's ISO generative AI exclusions for commercial general liability took effect in January 2026, and similar language has appeared in management and professional liability forms.
AI governance is the set of policies, roles and controls a company uses to decide which AI systems it adopts, how they are tested and monitored, and who answers for them when something goes wrong. Underwriters read it as evidence of how likely and how severe an AI claim would be, and Mayflower underwrites on it.
An AI incident response plan sets out how a company detects, escalates, contains and discloses failures of its AI systems, from a biased output to a compromised agent. It is a recommended document in Mayflower's application, and it helps a company give timely notice under a claims made and reported policy.
An AI system inventory is a register of the AI systems a company builds or uses, recording for each one its purpose, the data it uses, who owns it and how far it can affect people or money. Mayflower's application requires one, because the inventory defines the exposure being insured.
AI-washing is the practice of overstating what a company's artificial intelligence does or how much the company relies on it. Regulators treat such statements as potentially misleading, and the SEC settled its first AI-washing cases, against Delphia and Global Predictions, on March 18th 2024.
Algorithmic discrimination is unlawful differential treatment or impact that results from an automated system's output, such as a screening model that disadvantages applicants of a particular age, race or sex. It can arise without any intent to discriminate, because a model can learn proxies for protected traits from historical data.
An AM Best Financial Strength Rating is AM Best's independent opinion of an insurer's ability to meet its ongoing insurance obligations. Ratings of A and A- form the “Excellent” category, the second highest on the scale after “Superior”, and Mayflower's coverage is written on A- (Excellent) AM Best rated paper.
Automated decision-making technology is the term California and Colorado use for systems that replace or substantially assist human decisions about people, such as decisions on employment, credit or housing. California's privacy regulator requires compliance with its ADMT rules from January 1st 2027, and Colorado's SB 26-189, signed on May 14th 2026, replaced its 2024 AI Act with a narrower ADMT law whose obligations also start on January 1st 2027.
An automated employment decision tool is software that uses machine learning, statistics or AI to score, rank or screen candidates or employees in a way that substantially assists hiring or promotion decisions. New York City's Local Law 144 requires a bias audit within one year before such a tool is used, a public summary of the results and notice to candidates.
A bias audit is an assessment of whether an AI system's outcomes differ across groups defined by protected characteristics such as sex, race or age, usually by comparing selection or scoring rates. Some laws require one, as New York City does for automated employment decision tools, and Mayflower's application lists bias audit or fairness testing results among its recommended documents.
A claims made and reported policy covers a claim only if it is first made against the insured during the policy period, or any applicable extended reporting period, and is reported within the time the policy requires. Mayflower's AI liability coverage is written on this form, so prompt notice matters as much as the facts of the claim.
Cyber insurance covers losses from security and privacy events, such as data breaches, ransomware and network interruption, and the cost of responding to them. It is generally not written for the harm an AI system's output or decision causes without any breach, which is why AI liability coverage is designed to sit beside a cyber policy rather than replace it.
Data poisoning is an attack that corrupts the data used to train or fine-tune an AI model so that it learns hidden behavior chosen by the attacker, such as responding to a trigger phrase. Research by Anthropic, the UK AI Security Institute and the Alan Turing Institute published in October 2025 found that about 250 poisoned documents could plant a backdoor in models of 600 million to 13 billion parameters.
A deepfake is synthetic audio, video or imagery generated by AI to impersonate a real person convincingly. In early 2024 an Arup employee in Hong Kong made 15 transfers totaling HK$200 million (about US$25.6 million) after a video call in which fraudsters used fake voices and images of the firm's UK-based chief financial officer.
Also known as Eroding limits, Defense inside limits
Defense costs within limits means the cost of defending a claim is paid out of the policy's limit of liability, so legal spending reduces what is left for settlements and judgments and can exhaust the limit. Mayflower's policy form works this way, and defense costs are also subject to the retention.
A deployer is an organization that uses an AI system under its own authority in its business, as distinct from the developer that built it. The EU AI Act gives deployers obligations of their own, and deployers are often the party a customer or employee sues when an AI decision causes harm.
A developer is an organization that builds or substantially modifies an AI model or system and makes it available to others, and the EU AI Act calls this party the provider. A company can be a developer and a deployer at once, for example when it fine-tunes a foundation model and then uses it in its own products.
A difference-in-conditions (DIC) policy is written to respond where an underlying policy's terms are narrower than its own, for example because the underlying policy excludes a type of claim, so it fills gaps in cover rather than only adding limit. AI DIC Excess applies the idea to AI: a layer over a company's D&O, EPL and E&O policies that adds affirmative AI coverage where those policies are silent on AI or exclude it.
Directors and officers liability insurance protects a company's board members and executives, and often the company itself, against claims alleging wrongful acts in running the company, such as securities suits and breach of duty claims. Mayflower's AI Directors and Officers Liability (AI-D&O) module is written for those claims when they arise from the company's use, oversight or disclosure of AI.
Disparate impact is a legal theory under which a practice that looks neutral is unlawful if it falls more heavily on a protected group without adequate justification, with no need to prove intent. Executive Order 14281 (April 2025) deprioritized federal disparate-impact enforcement, but private suits over AI screening, such as Mobley v. Workday, continue.
Drop-down describes an excess or DIC policy stepping into a lower position, so that it responds as if it were primary when an underlying policy does not cover a claim or its limit is used up. Whether and how a policy drops down is set entirely by its wording.
Employment practices liability insurance covers an employer against claims by employees and applicants alleging discrimination, harassment, wrongful termination and similar violations of employment law. Mayflower's AI Employment Practices Liability (AI-EPL) module is written for those claims when they arise from AI used in hiring, promotion, discipline and other workforce decisions.
Errors and omissions insurance, also called professional liability insurance, covers a business against claims that its professional services or products caused a client a financial loss through error, negligence or failure to perform. Mayflower's AI Professional Liability (AI-E&O) module is written for those claims when an AI-enabled product or service is the cause, such as an inaccurate or hallucinated output.
A high-risk AI system under the EU AI Act is one used in a sensitive area listed in Annex III, such as employment, credit or access to essential services, or built into a product that already needs EU safety approval, and it carries the Act's heaviest duties. After the 2026 Digital Omnibus, those duties apply from December 2nd 2027 for Annex III systems and from August 2nd 2028 for product-embedded systems.
An excess layer is a policy that sits above a primary policy, or above other excess layers, and pays only after the limits beneath it are used up. Most excess layers follow the terms of the policy below them, so a gap in the primary wording, such as an AI exclusion, usually carries up through the tower.
An extended reporting period is extra time after a claims made policy ends during which claims arising from conduct before the end of the policy can still be reported. Whether one is available, how long it lasts and what it costs are set by the policy.
Fine-tuning is further training of an existing AI model on a narrower dataset so that it performs a particular task or follows a company's style. Mayflower's application counts a fine-tuned variant as a distinct AI system, because its behavior and risks can differ from the base model.
A follow-form policy adopts the terms, conditions and exclusions of the policy beneath it, adding limit without changing the scope of cover. A follow-form excess policy therefore inherits any AI exclusion in the primary wording.
A foundation model is a large AI model trained on broad data that can be adapted to many tasks, such as the large language models behind most generative AI products. The EU AI Act calls these general-purpose AI models, and their providers' duties under the Act have applied since August 2nd 2025.
Guardrails are technical and procedural controls that limit what an AI system can say or do, such as input and output filters, restrictions on the tools an agent may call and approval steps for high-value actions. Mayflower's application asks about controls of this kind, including transaction limits and approval gates for agents that can write data or move money.
A hallucination is output from a generative AI model that is fluent and confident but false, such as an invented fact, citation or policy term. NIST's Generative AI Profile calls the problem confabulation, and courts have sanctioned lawyers for filing AI-invented case citations since Mata v. Avianca in June 2023.
Human in the loop is a control design in which a designated person can halt, reverse or change an AI system's decision before it takes effect. Mayflower's application defines intervention capability in these terms and asks how far each AI system acts without such review.
The insuring agreement is the part of a policy that states what the insurer promises to pay for, such as loss arising from a claim for a wrongful act. Definitions, exclusions and conditions then set how far that promise reaches.
ISO/IEC 42001, published on December 18th 2023, is the international standard that sets requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an AI management system. Mayflower's application lists an ISO 42001 certificate or audit report as a recommended document where a company has one, and the application notes that recommended documents may improve terms.
A large language model is a foundation model trained on large amounts of text to predict and generate language, and it powers chatbots, coding assistants and many AI agents. Its output is probabilistic, so the same prompt can produce different answers, including wrong ones.
The limit of liability is the most a policy will pay, stated per claim, in the aggregate for the policy period or both. Under Mayflower's policy form, defense costs reduce and may exhaust it.
Loss runs are reports from a company's insurers that list the claims made under its policies, with dates, amounts paid and amounts reserved. Mayflower's application requires three years of loss runs for D&O, EPL and E&O.
A model card is a short document describing an AI model's intended use, training data, performance, known limitations and test results, so that people who rely on the model understand what it can and cannot do. Mayflower's application lists model documentation, model cards or data sheets among its recommended documents.
Model drift is the decline in an AI model's accuracy or fairness over time as the data it meets in production moves away from the data it was trained on. Drift is why underwriters ask how often a model is monitored and retested after deployment, as well as how it performed at launch.
Model risk management is the discipline of validating, monitoring and governing the models a firm relies on so that errors or misuse do not cause loss. The Federal Reserve's SR 26-2, issued with the FDIC and OCC on April 17th 2026, superseded SR 11-7 and places generative and agentic AI models outside its scope.
The NIST AI Risk Management Framework is a voluntary US framework, released on January 26th 2023, that organizes AI risk work into four functions: govern, map, measure and manage. NIST added a Generative AI Profile on July 26th 2024, and Texas's TRAIGA gives a defense to companies that substantially comply with that profile or another recognized risk framework.
A primary policy is the first layer of an insurance program, responding to a covered claim before any excess layer and usually controlling the defense. Mayflower's AI-D&O, AI-EPL and AI-E&O modules can be arranged as a modular primary policy.
Prompt injection is an attack in which instructions hidden in user input, or in content an AI system reads such as a web page or email, cause the system to ignore its intended rules. It can lead an assistant or agent to disclose data or take actions its operator never authorized, as in the EchoLeak flaw in Microsoft 365 Copilot that was patched in June 2025.
Red teaming is structured adversarial testing in which people or tools try to make an AI system fail, misbehave or leak data before attackers or customers find the weakness. The results show an underwriter that a company has looked for the failures that lead to claims.
The retention is the amount the insured pays toward a covered claim before the policy responds, much like a deductible. Under Mayflower's policy form, defense costs are applied against the retention.
Retrieval-augmented generation is a technique in which an AI model looks up documents from a company's own sources and uses them to answer, which grounds its output in current information. The quality and security of those sources then become part of the system's risk, because poisoned or outdated documents flow straight into its answers.
The retroactive date is the date before which wrongful acts are not covered under a claims made policy, even when the claim is first made during the policy period. Mayflower's application asks for a proposed retroactive date, and keeping it unchanged at renewal preserves cover for earlier AI decisions.
Shadow AI is the use of AI tools by employees without the company's approval or oversight, often through personal accounts. IBM's 2025 Cost of a Data Breach study found that organizations with high levels of shadow AI saw breach costs about US$670,000 higher on average than those with little or none.
Silent AI is the uncertainty that arises when an insurance policy neither covers nor excludes losses caused by artificial intelligence. Whether such a policy responds to an AI claim is left to argument after the loss, which is why insurers are now adding explicit AI exclusions or affirmative AI coverage.
Also known as Insurance program, Tower of coverage
A tower is the stack of policies that together make up a company's limit for one line of cover, starting with the primary policy and rising through excess layers. A gap at the base of the tower, such as an AI exclusion in the primary wording, usually runs all the way up unless a DIC layer fills it.
A wrongful act is the conduct that triggers management and professional liability coverage, typically defined as an actual or alleged error, misstatement, omission, neglect or breach of duty. In an AI claim the alleged wrongful act may be a decision delegated to a model, such as an automated rejection or an inaccurate output.
These definitions are general information, and they are not legal advice or an offer of insurance. The meaning of a term in a particular policy is set by that policy's own definitions and wording.
Next step
Apply the Vocabulary to Your Own Program
The online application asks about the same systems, governance and coverage terms defined here, and a company or its broker can start it at any time and save progress along the way.